Структура и нарушения саморегуляции деятельности: точка роста культурно-исторической деятельностной психологии

Культурно-историческая психология. 2024. Т. 20. № 3. С. 27–35.

Leontiev D.

The problem setting of the paper stems from the idea of shifts in research contexts and explanatory
emphases in the Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) through the history of its development, specifically,
from putting the concepts of mediation and self-regulation (autoregulation) to the foreground in
the 1980s. The immediate object of the analysis are the elements of activity autoregulation structure and
varieties of its possible distortions. In line with the distinction of five elements of any contour of autoregulation
as the mechanism of cyclic action correction basing on the comparison of the feedback on the current
results with the preset goal criterion, ten arts of autoregulation distortions are differentiated and described:

1А. Lack of goal criteria or lacking selectivity as regards such criteria; 1B. Excessive rigidity of the goal
criteria; 2А. Difficulties in the transition from decision to implementation; 2B. Uncontrolled, uncorrectable
acting; 3А. Lacking sensitivity to the feedback; 3B. Anxious hypersensitivity to the feedback. 4A. Lack of
readiness to detect mistakes and to correct erroneous actions; 4B. Failed comparison of the feedback with
goal criteria, spontaneous responding; 5А. Denying mistakes and refusal of their correction; 5B. Painful
responding to errors and failures.

Keywords: обратная связь, action, действие, цель, саморегуляция, regulation, distortion, feedback, регуляция, functional paradigm, goal, коррекция, correction, функциональная парадигма, autoregulation, культурно-историческая деятельностная психология (КИДП), отклонение, Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT)