?
De titulis Bosporanis et viciniis VII
The paper continues the series of comments, and corrections to some published inscriptions
from Cimmerian Bosporus. No 44 (fig. 1) discusses the worship of Athena Ergane in Panticapaeum
in her possible relationship to Athena Polias on the background of reconstruction
of the polis’ life in this city at the 1st quarter of the V CBC. No 45 (fig. 2) presents the correct
lecture of the inscription on the bailer from the kurgan’s excavations in Rostov-on-Don region
at 1927. No 46 (fig. 3–4) interprets the sings of the second line of inscription on the bronze cauldron
founded in Volgograd region. Nos 47, and 70 returns to the interpretation of 18 times
ἀνώνυμος in the lead tablet from Panticapaeum necropolis. No 48 proposes some observations
concerning the lead letter of Oreios from Myrmekion. No 49 (fig. 5) argues about the Athena’s
cult in Phanagoria. Nos 50–54 (fig. 6, 7. 2) reinterprets the graffiti of the beginning of AD from
Phanagoria. Nos 55–56 insists that Herakas, and Sarmatas aren’t sarmatians anthroponyms
but the hypocoristics of Greek names. Nos 57–61 (fig. 7. 3, 4; 8. 2) suggests some corrections
to graffiti, and dipinti from Phanagoria. No 62 (fig. 8. 4) offers the new understanding of the
beginning of lead letter from Patraeus. No 63 (fig. 8. 3) demonstrates that the famous graffito
from Kyteion is the defixio. No 64 (fig. 9. 1) proves that the letter from Hermonassa talks about
the legal proceedings concerning Kleidikos. No 65 (fig. 9. 3) corroborates the V. P. Yailenko’s
lecture of the ostrakon from the Vyshestebliyevskaya-3. No 66 (fig. 9. 4) demonstrates that
the lead letter founded on Mithridates’ mount in 1996 speaks about the guarantee on security.
No 67 (fig. 9. 2) proposes the correct lecture of the defixio from Panticapaeum. Nos 68–69
(fig. 9. 5) discusses some lists of names founded on Zenonus’ Chersonesos