• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБВ
  • АБВ
  • АБВ
  • A
  • A
  • A
  • A
  • A
Обычная версия сайта
  • RU
  • EN
  • HSE University
  • Publications
  • Book chapter
  • Multilingual Pragmaticon: Database of Discourse Formulae
  • RU
  • EN
Расширенный поиск
Высшая школа экономики
Национальный исследовательский университет
Priority areas
  • business informatics
  • economics
  • engineering science
  • humanitarian
  • IT and mathematics
  • law
  • management
  • mathematics
  • sociology
  • state and public administration
by year
  • 2027
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1958
  • More
Subject
News
August 13, 2026
‘Working with AI Solves a Wide Range of Engineering Problems
Artificial intelligence is a working tool based on a balanced combination of algorithms and engineering. Experts and doctoral students from the HSE Moscow Institute of Electronics and Mathematics explain how AI technologies can improve an application, device, or system, and what engineering tasks are solved in the process.
August 12, 2026
‘I Would Like My Research to Help Make the World a Calmer and Better Place
Whatever task Saraa Ali, Junior Research Fellow at the Laboratory of Methods for Big Data Analysis (LAMBDA) of the AI and Digital Science Institute (HSE Faculty of Computer Science), is working on, she thinks about how it can benefit people. She told the Young Scientists of HSE University project about her large family, diagnosing three-phase motors, and her dream of building a children’s home in her native country.
August 11, 2026
‘The Peak of Stupidity and ‘The Valley of Despair: HSE Economists Propose an Explanation for the Dunning–Kruger Effect
The Dunning–Kruger effect, which describes a sharp surge in self-confidence among beginners followed by an equally rapid decline as they gain experience, can be explained by the nature of the learning process and the acquisition of new knowledge. This conclusion was reached by Andrey Vorchik of the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences together with independent researcher Murat Mamyshev. They developed a mathematical model of learning and demonstrated how subjective confidence is formed and changes as knowledge accumulates, as well as how teachers can reduce the ‘valley of despair’ experienced by learners.

 

Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!

Publications
  • Books
  • Articles
  • Chapters of books
  • Working papers
  • Report a publication
  • Research at HSE

?

Multilingual Pragmaticon: Database of Discourse Formulae

P. 3331–3336.
Buzanov A., Bychkova P., Molchanova A., Postnikova A., Ryzhova D.

The paper presents a multilingual database aimed to be used as a tool for typological analysis of response constructions called discourse formulae (DF), cf. English ‘No way¡ or French ‘Ça va¡(‘all right’). The two primary qualities that make DF of theoretical interest for linguists are their idiomaticity and the special nature of their meanings (cf. consent, refusal, negation), determined by their dialogical function. The formal and semantic structures of these items are language-specific. Compiling a database with DF from various languages would help estimate the diversity of DF in both of these aspects, and, at the same time, establish some frequently occurring patterns. The DF in the database are accompanied with glosses and assigned with multiple tags, such as pragmatic function, additional semantics, the illocutionary type of the context, etc. As a starting point, Russian, Serbian and Slovene DF are included into the database. This data already shows substantial grammatical and lexical variability.

Language: English
Text on another site
Keywords: Construction Grammarlinguistic databasediscourse formulaepragmaticalizationpragmatic typology

In book

Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2022.
Similar publications
Особенности функционирования существительных с опустошенной семантикой в русской разговорной речи
Nikishina E., Труды института русского языка им. В.В. Виноградова 2025 № 3(45) С. 231–244
The article examines placeholder nouns (штука, фигня, хреновина, etc.) in Russian colloquial speech. These words can function similarly to pronouns by substituting for other words, but their range of functions is much broader than that of pronouns. The study analyzes two groups of vague reference words: initially neutral ones (штука, вещь, дело) and initially evaluative ...
Added: March 8, 2026
Изучай – не хочу: от фиксированной идиомы к конструкции
Reznikova T., Анисимов А. Д., Русский язык в научном освещении 2025 № 1(49) С. 37–61
В статье рассматривается конструкция, состоящая из императивной формы глагола и отрицательного оборота не хочу (Vimp — не хочу), и ее развитие с XIX в., когда она впервые встречается в Национальном корпусе русского языка. Для ранних реализаций конструкции характерен ограниченный набор глаголов, выступающих в императивной позиции (прежде всего ешь и пей), тем самым выражение в этот период может быть квалифицировано как ...
Added: February 24, 2026
Куда ни кинь — всюду идиома: о семантической эволюции одного устойчивого выражения
Kharlamova D. S., Reznikova T., Русская речь 2024 № 6 С. 34–51
The paper concerns the semantic evolution of the Russian expression "kuda ni kin’" on the material of the Russian National Corpus. On the synchronous level, this expression has two distinct meanings: visual (1) ‘wherever you look’ and mental (2) ‘whatever you think about’. Corpus data show that more abstract semantics (2) came into use fi rst. This might ...
Added: August 6, 2025
Building a Database of Conversational Routines
Bychkova P., Alyaxey Yaskevich, Serafima Gyulasaryan et al., , in: Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024).: ELRA and ICCL, 2024. P. 2548–2555.
This paper discusses the Routinicon, a new constructicographic resource for the description of conversational routines. Conversational routines are defined as conventional formulaic expressions that language speakers use in standard extralinguistic situations (cf. Bless you! as a reaction to sneezing or Who’s there? as a typical answer to a knock on the door). The Routinicon’s goal ...
Added: February 25, 2025
Kak že kak že! Russian discourse formula of confirmation as a marker of recognition
Ekaterina Rakhilina, Bychkova P., , in: Constructions with lexical repetitions in East Slavic.: De Gruyter Mouton, 2024. P. 197–222.
The chapter presents a case study of the repetition mechanism within the development of discourse formulae, i.e., multi-word formulaic replies similar to yes and no. It closely examines the process of pragmaticalization in the Russian formula Kak že! (‘how part’) and its duplicated counterpart. The diachronic corpus data shows that the formula Kak že! emerged ...
Added: February 13, 2025
Наш круг час от часу редеет: о диахронии семантики и сочетаемости конструкции «час от часу»
Панова А. В., Budennaya E., Русский язык в научном освещении 2024 № 2(48) С. 150–184
In the article the evolution of semantics and combinability of the construction čas ot času ‘hour from hour’ is considered using the framework of diachronic construction grammar. This construction belongs to a more general schema X ot ‘X-a ‘X from X-a’ with the meaning of time (den’ oto dnja ‘day from day’, god ot goda ...
Added: October 30, 2024
God knows how it turns out: on three constructions including Bog ‘God’, čert ‘devil’ and some taboo words in the Russian language over the last three centuries
Budennaya E., Litvintseva K., Yakovleva A., Jazykovedny Casopis 2023 Vol. 74 No. 1 P. 19–31
The constructions with the anchor [Noun-Nom Verb (meaning ‘to know’)] are very productive in Russian. In this article we show that variables such as Bog ‘God’, čert ‘devil’ and xer/xren ‘X/horseradish’ have some common patterns, as well as some shifts with exclusive patterns in semantics and constructionalization. ...
Added: September 28, 2023
Russian Constructicon 2.0: New Features and New Perspectives of the Biggest Constructicon Ever Built
Orlov A., Zoia Butenko, Daria Demidova et al., , in: Компьютерная лингвистика и интеллектуальные технологии: По материалам ежегодной международной конференции «Диалог». Вып. 22.Вып. 22.: [б.и.], 2023. P. 378–385.
Added: August 26, 2023
Третий лишний : la sémantique de l’adjectif лишний à la lumière de ses équivalents français
Kor Chahine I., Plungian V., Rakhilina E. V., , in: Études de linguistique slave – mélanges offerts à Robert Roudet.: Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Midi, 2020. P. 161–176.
Les mots servent à désigner des objets ou des choses qui nous entourent ou qui entrent dans des situations et sont reliés entre eux. Dans certains domaines, certaines langues sont très précises et détaillent chaque élément de la situation. On considère que c’est le principe même des langues classifcatoires, parmi lesquelles on range généralement le ...
Added: November 15, 2022
How to build a constructicon in five years: The Russian example
Rakhilina E. V., Жукова В. А., Janda L. A. et al., Belgian Journal of Linguistics 2022 Vol. 34 P. 161–173
We provide a practical step-by-step methodology of how to build a full-scale constructicon resource for a natural language, sharing our experience from the nearly completed project of the Russian Constructicon, an open-access searchable database of over 2,200 Russian constructions (https://site.uit.no /russian-constructicon/). The constructions are organized in families, clusters, and networks based on their semantic and ...
Added: November 15, 2022
Construction Grammar and Slavic
Rakhilina E. V., Uhlik M., , in: Encyclopedia of Slavic Languages and Linguistics Online.: Brill, 2020.
The article explores the application of Construction Grammar Theory to the analysis of the main Slavic cognate languages. ...
Added: November 15, 2022
Constructing constructicons
Ziem A., Willich A., Michel S., John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2022.
Added: October 25, 2022
ФРАЗЕОЛОГИЯ В РАКУРСЕ «РУССКОГО КОНСТРУКТИКОНА»
Rakhilina E. V., Жукова В. А., Демидова Д. А. et al., Труды института русского языка им. В.В. Виноградова 2022 № 2 (32) С. 13–44
We compare two projects: the ideographic description of Russian phraseology in the «Thesaurus of Russian idioms» [Baranov, Dobrovolsky 2007], on the one hand, and “The Russian Constructicon” (https://constructicon.github.io/russian/), a joint project of the research group CLEAR (UiT The Arctic University of Norway) and School of Linguistics (NRU HSE), on the other hand. Both resources describe ...
Added: July 29, 2022
Pragmatic Markers and Parts of Speech: on the Problems of Annotation of the Speech Corpus
Bogdanova-Beglarian Natalia, Zaides K., , in: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Proceedings of the International Conference "Internet and Modern Society" IMS-2020, 17-20 June 2020, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia).: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2020. P. 129–139.
Added: February 3, 2022
Towards pragmatic construction typology: The case of discourse formulae
Bychkova P., Rakhilina E. V., , in: Discourse phenomena in typological perspective.: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2023. Ch. 3 P. 35–63.
This paper discusses the frame method developed by Moscow lexical typology group in application to pragmatic constructions, namely, discourse formulae (idiomatic answers like Fair enough or You bet!). The methods of data collection and analysis are illustrated with a case study of negative discourse formulae in four Slavic languages. The study shows how the field of negation is organized, and how answering strategies differ in ...
Added: October 29, 2021
‘No way!’ Discourse formulae of disagreement in Russian and English: a comparative study
Koziuk E., Badryzlova Y., , in: Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue” (2021)Issue 20: Основной том.: -, 2021. P. 445–455.
Added: May 11, 2021
Свойства дискурсивных формул на примере русских конструкций ты что и что ты
Bychkova P., Русский язык в научном освещении 2020 № 2 (40) С. 88–111
The paper discusses semantic description of the so-called discourse formulae, idiomatic expressions used as speaker's reactions in a dialogue. They are considered in the framework of construction grammar, as a peripheral class of constructions with its specific properties. A case study of two synonymous Russian discourse formulae TY ČTO and ČTO TY provides an account ...
Added: September 23, 2020
  • About
  • About
  • Key Figures & Facts
  • Sustainability at HSE University
  • Faculties & Departments
  • International Partnerships
  • Faculty & Staff
  • HSE Buildings
  • HSE University for Persons with Disabilities
  • Public Enquiries
  • Studies
  • Admissions
  • Programme Catalogue
  • Undergraduate
  • Graduate
  • Exchange Programmes
  • Summer University
  • Summer Schools
  • Semester in Moscow
  • Business Internship
  • Research
  • International Laboratories
  • Research Centres
  • Research Projects
  • Monitoring Studies
  • Conferences & Seminars
  • Academic Jobs
  • Yasin (April) International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development
  • Media & Resources
  • Publications by staff
  • HSE Journals
  • Publishing House
  • iq.hse.ru: commentary by HSE experts
  • Library
  • Economic & Social Data Archive
  • Video
  • HSE Repository of Socio-Economic Information
  • HSE1993–2026
  • Contacts
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
Edit