?
ЦИФРОВАЯ ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯ: ПРАВОВОЕ ИЗМЕРЕНИЕ
The legal dimension of digital transformation is formed by approaches to the legal regulation of public relations and the interests of participants in this process - the state, business, and users - behind them. The so-called information law as an amorphous institution without its own subject and method proved unable to withstand the challenges of digital transformation. Effective regulation should be carried out using the method of actual possibility coinciding with legal possibility, i.e. subjective law. The issues of personal data as the main "fuel" of the digital economy are discussed between the state and business. This leads to the exclusion of citizens from the discussion due to their lack of resources to defend their own interests. Such resources can only be provided by the introduction of tools that guarantee responsibility to the data subject for violation of his rights. In the sphere of turnover of industrial and other non-personal data, the lack of regulation is rather a boon that accelerates the development of the market. However, at the same time, the inequality of the parties (equipment suppliers and its users) in access to data is increasing. The right to access their data and mechanisms for data portability between platforms should become tools for protecting the interests of users here. Although the interests of the state in the digital sphere are related to ensuring its own sovereignty, attempts to link certain types of data with information systems located on the territory of this state ("data localization") contradict the structure of information flows that have undergone digital transformation. In these conditions, regulation should take into account the formation of data sets and services instantly, at a certain assembly point, which requires ensuring the freedom of turnover of metadata on the basis of which the assembly is carried out. Conscious needs and interests - their own and other participants in the relationship - help to develop the digital economy in the most equitable way, drawing all new subjects into a state of coordinated interests and thereby mutually effectively limiting each other's interests. State regulation in the digital economy, as the least effective, should be implemented only last if it is not possible to achieve legal equality of interests through the efforts of individual players or the interaction of market participants.