Методологические аспекты философских концепций справедливости

The article introduce translation of John Rawls's research "The Law of Peoples". This lection was written in 1993 and has not been translated into Russian before. This article analyses the conception of international justice extended by Rawls considering its terminology, methodology and basic points. International justice is explored in correlation with rawlsian fundamental theory of justice. But through the special scope conception of international justice based on liberal values goes beyond liberal societies and gives a framework for transformation of international law and policy.

Added: Sep 28, 2012

Практическая реализация социоинженерной деятельности в организациях в контексте организационного развития

Плотников М. В. В кн.: VI Всероссийский фестиваль науки: тезисы докладов. Н. Новгород: ННГАСУ, 2011. С. 59-65.

Added: May 14, 2013

Социальная психология справедливости

Гулевич О. А. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2011.

Added: Oct 1, 2012

Оздоровление предприятий

Плотников М. В. В кн.: Здоровье как ресурс. Н. Новгород: Издательство НИСОЦ, 2010. С. 293-297.

Added: May 14, 2013

Направления изучения представлений о справедливости

Гулевич О. А. Вопросы психологии. 2003. № 3. С. 123-132.

Added: Oct 1, 2012

Minimal Justice and Regime Change in Brian Orend’s Political Ethics

Kumankov A. Философия и исследования культуры. WP20. Высшая школа экономики, 2016

Brian Orend, one of the leading just war theorists, is best known today for elaborating jus post bellum principles while his works contain another distinctive component, concept of “minimally just” political community. This article explores Briand Orend’s conception of “minimally just” political community, especially the meaning of this concept for Orend’s version of just war theory. Orend uses Kantian political and moral philosophy in order to prove there are two key functions of state: protection of human rights and establishing order. Since human rights are universal, a state should assist in protection of human rights of every person, not only its citizen’s rights. This leads to situation when states avoid of harming foreigners and aggressive wars become banned. Orend call a state “minimally just” if it follows these rules. However, these states could violate non-intervention principle and start wars. A crucial point here is an idea that a “minimally just” state has a right to fight for the overthrow of the aggressive regimes and establishment of “minimal justice”. The author concludes that this notion helps Orend extend the list of just causes of war, though his original intention was limitation of cases when arms could be used.

Added: Oct 16, 2015

Социальные технологии менеджмента

Плотников М. В. Н. Новгород: НИУ РАНХиГС, 2012.

Added: Jan 19, 2013

Общественная мораль. Философские, нормативно-этические и прикладные проблемы

Edited by: Р. Апресян М.: Альфа-М, 2009.

Added: Oct 27, 2012