• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Article

Есть ли в феноменологии сотериологическая модель? Полемическая реплика на статью А.Ю. Неделя

Вопросы философии. 2020. № 3. С. 186-193.

This article is a polemical response to the sketch by A.Yu Nedel (“Voprosy
Filosofii”, 7, 2018). There we criticize his hypothesis of soteriological pattern of
Husserl's phenomenology. We use the statements of Husserl and Vasubandhu on
the strategic purposes of their researches as the arguments of refutation. Their
statements demonstrate the fundamental differences between the purposes of
both philosophers, the differences of the implicit presuppositions of their researches
determined by their cultures (in particular, different views on consciousness:
Husserl saw consciousness as intentional, and Buddhists saw it as
non-intentional). We point out in the article the unclear meanings of Husserl’s
thesis “Back to the things themselves”, the invalid interpretations of Sanskrit
terms and too shallow generalizations made by the author, in particular, the identification
of Husserl’s “pure consciousness” (reine Bewußtsein) with the Buddhist
“pure consciousness” (anāsravā-prajñā).