The article is devoted to the discussion on fin de siècle in the context of the trajectory the modernity took in the twentieth century Russia. The author follows C. Castoriadis’ definition of modernity through double imaginary of autonomy and rational mastery as well as P. Wagner’s characterisation of modernity as experience and interpretation. He demonstrates how in Russian constellation of modernity autonomy came to be understood as a secondary to rational mastery and how collective autonomy started to dominate over individual one. For this purpose, he discusses details of N. Federov’s “Philosophy of the Common Task” as well as peculiarities of the development of Russian society of the beginning of the last century. Then M. Khomyakov turns to the contemporary fin de siècle and discusses what he sees as a major crisis of modernity in general and democracy, in particular. Thus, the article interprets fin de siècles as inherent to the modernity crises, the main elements of which are revising, reinterpretation, reformulation and renegotiation of the modernity’s fundamentals.
Найдены 3 публикации
P. 329-350.Changing societies and personalities. 2018. Vol. 2. No. 4.
Добавлено: 12 февраля 2019
P. 220-236.. Changing societies and personalities. 2017. Vol. 1. No. 3.
Добавлено: 29 января 2018
Weber’s Nationalism vs. Weberian Methodological Individualism: Implications for Contemporary Social Theory
P. 124-138.Changing societies and personalities. 2019. Vol. 3. No. 2.
Добавлено: 10 июля 2019