Вокруг масляной лампы. Ответ на реплики

Философия. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2022. Т. 6. № 1. С. 330–336.

Mikhailovsky A.

In this article, the author examines the concept of truth by M. Heidegger in the light of social and epistemological issues. He believes that “truth as unconcealment” is a more productive approach than the theory of correspondence or coherence, since it is able to capture a number of socio-humanitarian concepts where verification is complicated. The author believes that Heidegger’s existential-historical thought about the “essence of truth” receives a logical continuation in the “esoteric initiative” or “sygetics”, which – if it is explicated in relation to the social attitudes and imperatives of the thinker – means the strategy of minimizing the public sphere and returning to one’s own. In relation to the institutional (re)production of knowledge, this means a chance for philosophy and scientific research to start a new existence on the other side of academic professional education, i.e. outside the modern university. Finally, Heidegger's concept of truth calls into question the scientistic image of science and philosophy and shows that the true knowledge cannot totally depend on the requirement of rational reconstruction of propositions.

Keywords: Мартин Хайдеггер, истина, truth, современный университет, modern University, эзотерическая инициатива, Heidegger's esoteric initiative, Martin Heidegger, Unconcealment, Sygetics, непотаенность, сигетика, philosophical mysticism, философский мистицизм