Критерии ценности научного факта: опыт персонологической наукометрии

Мир психологии. Научно-методический журнал. 2018. № №3 (95). С. 224–232.

Petrovskiy V., Андреева А. И.

The article discusses the problems of criteria for assessing the importance of scientific facts in psycho- logy, as well as the accuracy of expert assessments of psychologists predicting the results of psychological experiments. The personal approach of V. A. Petrovskiy is presented, which estimates the nontriviality of scientific facts. The principle of analyzing the nontriviality of the fact is illustrated in three examples from the field of personality psychology (an estimate of the nontriviality of the facts obtained by S. A. Shchebe- tenko in the study of reflexive adaptations and facts that characterize the manifestations of the empathy of counseling psychologists in the study of M. V. Sizikova). Of the three tasks tested, two were nontrivial. It was also revealed that when answering some questions concerning the outcomes of psychological expe- riments, psychologists-experts often give inaccurate forecasts than non-psychologists.

Keywords: predictability, criteria of the value of facts, the criteria of scientific knowledge, nontriviality, psychologists-experts, критерии ценности фактов, критерии научности знания, нетривиальность, прогностичность, психологи-эксперты