?
«Суверенная зависимость»: механизмы удержания в российских цифровых экосистемах
The classical theory of platforms describes user dependency on digital ecosystems as a
rational economic choice: users stay because it is convenient and switching is costly. But what happens
when there is nowhere to switch — not because alternatives are less convenient, but because the state
has eliminated them? This article introduces the concept of “sovereign lock-in” to describe a regime in
which market-based retention mechanisms and state digital sovereignty policy mutually reinforce one
another. Drawing on content analysis of corporate documents, industry reports, and regulatory materials
across five major Russian digital ecosystems — Sber, Yandex, VK, MTS, and T-Bank — covering the period
2020–2026, the study identifies three mechanisms of user dependency and four dimensions of partner
dependency. The analysis shows that after 2022, as a result of sanctions, the departure of international
platforms, and the introduction of “white lists” for critical digital infrastructure, the nature of lock-in
changed qualitatively: from preferential to structural. Theoretically, the article bridges platform economics,
infrastructure studies, and the sociology of markets to argue that Russia represents the clearest case
of “sovereign lock-in” among major economies — one in which ecosystem companies are not merely
passive beneficiaries of digital sovereignty policy, but active co-authors of the institutional environment
that sustains their dominance. The concept of “sovereign lock-in” fills a theoretical gap left by Western
platform theory and offers a generalizable framework for analyzing digital ecosystems under managed-
internet regimes.