Должник в исполнительном производстве: кто или что? Комментарий к определению Судебной коллегии по гражданским делам ВС РФ от 9 сентября 2025 года № 5-КГ25-115-К2

Вестник экономического правосудия Российской Федерации. 2026. № 5(147). С. 13–26.

Galperin M.

Using the example of a case that recently reached the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (SC RF), the
author notes the phenomenon of depersonalization of the trial and enforcement proceedings, unusual for Russian
jurisdiction, but long known in common law countries. For some categories of disputes, the defendant figure
itself loses its significance, and the procedural status follows the thing that is at the center of the proceedings. Therefore, it is increasingly difficult to determine whether there are grounds for procedural succession, even when it occurred in material law, including when the defendant made transactions with property to evade the execution of a court decision. At the same time, the departure from the classical views on the subject composition of the legal relationship and the process of its forced implementation entails a misalignment of material and procedural
regulation, undermines the foundations of private law and justice.

Keywords: право собственности, исполнительное производство, правопреемство, перевод долга, право на иск