?
Размышления о спасении тонущего ребёнка: эффективный альтруизм и социальные институты
The movement of effective altruism, which emerged at the beginning of the 21st century, represents a new form of utilitarian philosophy that has had a significant impact on Anglo-American philosophical thought in the 19th and 20th centuries. A key feature of effective altruism is its emphasis on practicality. The movement positions itself as an entity that has the potential to influence and improve the world around it This requires only a slight change in your life and build it according to an ethical program of effective altruism. As a result, the movement has garnered significant popularity in developed nations.
The primary focus of the effective altruism movement lies on the development and implementation of evidence-based programs. One of the most popular tools utilized by the movement is the methodology of randomized controlled trials, which was adapted from the medical field and has proven to be highly effective. Efficiency, scientific validity, and the attainability of desired outcomes have become hallmarks of the effective altruist movement. However, upon closer examination of areas where effective altruism has had the most impact (health, medicine, education, and infrastructure), it becomes clear that the verifiable achievement of the stated results is not such a simple, and often completely impossible task.
This article discusses the institutional critique of effective altruism. The author argues that within the framework of this critique, the movement of effective altruism focuses on solving highly specific issues and thus unthinkingly ignores the most significant issue of social institutions within which assistance programs are implemented. In the article, the author analyzes traditional social institutions, institutions of democracy and the institution of the state (sovereignty), as well as their impact on the effectiveness of effective altruism programs. In addition, an attempt is made to summarize the research data and answer the question of what the main obstacles are to effective programs forecasting. The author concludes that the claimed effectiveness is unattainable in real world, and it is only possible to speak about verifiable outcomes within very significant limitations.