?
Defending Nihilism About Musical Works
According to nihilism, musical works do not exist. Platonism, on the other hand, states that they do exist—qua abstract objects of some sort. Given that denying the existence of musical works is rather counterintuitive, it does not come as a surprise that nihilism is considerably less popular than platonism. This is not to say that among ontologists, no one prefers nihilism. But an overwhelming majority of them are on the platonist side. Is this situation justified? Presumably, the answer is “yes” only if platonism is more theoretically virtuous than nihilism. My goal in this paper is to show that under certain widely held methodological assumptions, the given condition is not satisfied: The theoretical merits of nihilism are, on balance, at least comparable to those of platonism. This result, if true, provides a powerful motivation to call into question the dominance of platonism, while adopting a more favorable attitude to nihilism.