The article examines features of staff stimulation system for government service. The authors identify the main problems on the basis of an internal diagnostics of public administration department stimulation system. The research results in proposed recommendations of how to solve the problems identified in the stimulation system.
Since 2014 the expenditure side of the Federal budget and some budgets of Russian regions have based on the state programs. This fact has generated a lot of debate and disagreement among researchers. Practice of foreign countries confirms the validity and feasibility of this format of state bodies performance management. However, the performance planning and monitoring of public authorities has not only important advantages but also some uncontrollable negative consequences that are called "performance paradoxes".
In this research authors developed methodology of "performance paradoxes" identification, which can occur during the implementation of state programs. Thus, an attempt was made to move from conceptual notions of "paradoxes of performance" to the instrumental level of study, which allows to provide a systematic approach to the identification and prevention of side effects arising from the performance evaluation system, documents of program planning.
Upon review of the three state programs of the Perm region some significant “performance paradoxes" are determined. These performance paradoxes are explained by the complexity and diversity of policy, and redundancy of performance indicators assigned to the programme interventions.
Based on the results of expert interviews the main problems of the functioning of municipal employment services and social protection service and possible ways to solve them are considered