Ordering motivation and Likert scale ratings: When a numeric scale is not necessarily better

Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. No. 13. Article 942593.

Tyumeneva Y. A., Sudorgina Y., Kislyonkova A., Lebedeva M.

Measuring psychological attributes, such as motivation, typically involves rating scales, assuming that an attribute can be ordered, and that ratings represent this order. Previously, only the first assumption had been tested, albeit limited. First, we checked the ordinal structure of motivation, looking at whether people can establish transitive relations between motivation levels in pairwise comparisons; and we found different ordering patterns: strict transitive, weak transitive, changing order, and intransitivity. The rate of intransitivity was similar to that found previously and was somewhat higher than we obtained when we asked participants to compare definitely quantitative attributes (such as weight). Second, we checked if specific ordering patterns were related to individual interpretations of the statements that deviated from expected motivation types. Indeed, about a third of participants miscategorized statements, and these deviant interpretations were related to intransitivity as well as weak transitivity. Third, we checked whether Likert ratings represent the order of motives obtained from pairwise comparisons. We found rather homomorphic representation: ratings correlated with the order, but they did not differentiate between different ordering patterns and hierarchies of motives. We conclude that the Likert rating scale provides less information about respondents than pairwise ordering. The findings question the mainstream practice of using rating scales without testing underlying assumptions.

Keywords: motivation, rating scale, transitivity, ordinal structure, pairwise ordering

Publication based on the results of: The investigation of changes in academic heterogeneity of elementary school students: transitions from group with learning difficulties to group with educational success (2022)