Обычный предпринимательский риск в контексте ответственности руководителя юридического лица за причиненные ему убытки
This article focuses on research into normal business risk, a notion which is used in resolving disputes involving tort liability of the CEO of a company and recovery of losses suffered by the company. Based on the legislative provisions, the analysis of judicial practice and the study of doctrinal positions, the authors define the concept of normal business
risk, identify some problematic aspects of its implementation, assert its inappropriate use in assessing the behavior of the company’s CEO for compliance with good faith and reasonableness requirements as well as explain why this concept needs to be replaced.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/