Проблема генезиса культурной истории у И. Канта. Заполнение пробелов

Гуманитарный научный вестник. 2019. № 1. С. 17–22.

Glebov O.

The article is devoted to the problem of the genesis of cultural history of I. Kant. The author "fills the gaps" of Kant's theory based on the data of theories of J. Feibleman and B. Malinovsky. The work also uses the methodology of phenomenology. The object of study is the source of culture, and the subject is the intentional consciousness. The purpose of the work is to identify the possible source of culture. In the course of the study the following tasks were set: 1). To consider I. Kant's concept of the source of culture. 2). To find the apodictic evidence of the source of culture. 3). To "fill the gaps" of Kant's theory in accordance with the data of modern anthropology. 4). To derive an apodictic obviousness source of culture. The novelty of this work is in the phenomenological and anthropological examination of Kant's less popular texts. The author comes to the following conclusion: the origin of the culture is the emergence of the intentional apparatus, which allows the “Other” and the “Self” be constituted and also allows to throw meaning on given in present transforming it into a culture.

Keywords: онтология, ontology, Бронислав Малиновский, философия культуры, интенциональность, philosophy of culture, phenomenology, philosophical anthropology, философская антропология, intentionality, истоки, генезис философии, классическая немецкая феноменология, Malinovsky, genesis of philosophy, философия города, cultural phenomenology, philosophy of city