Революция в России и трансформация Мир-Системы
The author looks into the contradictions of security and the paradigms of their resolution in the modern era. The issue of security is considered in conjunction with the issue of justice. Emphasi is placed on the fact that the disharmony of the modern security paradigms is just temporary. As the global civil society is growing stronger, the paradigm of human rights must once again regain its priority. Just as in the case of the return of the multipolarity of the world, the paradigm of cooperation and non-intervention must get back the lost rights
The agenda of the democratic reformation of 1989-1990. question of changing the electoral system was perhaps the first. The essence of it in the words of Solzhenitsyn was that of "martyshechih" Soviet-style elections, go to the free competition of parties to the real. (At that time, the reverse process was difficult to imagine). No one then there is little doubt, and a key point of this reform: free elections - one of the safeguards against arbitrariness of politicians seeking to remain in power indefinitely. This guarantee, however, is useless without the connection of at least two others: the freedom of the media and freedom of political parties. The interconnection and interaction of these conditions, Russian voters have already received the submission in 1990 - during the first elections were accompanied by a political struggle in the Russian parliament.
The paper considers some important elements of Keynes’s theoretical approach which are rejected by the most adherents of the modern mainstream economics. Such elements are the idea that (immeasurable) uncertainty is different from (measurable) risk, and also derivation of some key macroeconomic functions (of consumption, investment, money demand) not from optimizing human behavior. Furthermore, the paper explores also Keynes’s criticism to formalization of economic analysis.
Economic crisis in globalized world made inevitable forging of a system of governance which would prevent the international community from large scale upheavals in future. The 2008-2009 summits of G-20 gave hope of a possibility to form a global political leadership. So far the system of international governance is being mapped up and appears in the form of a triangle with UN, G-20 and the most influential international institutions (WTO, IMF, MB) as its three facets.
A model of global equilibtium based on Keynesian and Leontief's multioplier concepts is suggested.
The article deals with the processes of building the information society and security in the CIS in accordance with modern conditions. The main objective is to review existing mechanisms for the formation of a common information space in the Eurasian region, regarded as one of the essential aspects of international integration. The theoretical significance of the work is to determine the main controls of the regional information infrastructure, improved by the development of communication features in a rapid process.The practical component consists in determining the future policies of the region under consideration in building the information society. The study authors used historical-descriptive approach and factual analysis of events having to do with drawing the contours of today's global information society in the regional refraction.
The main result is the fact that the development of information and communication technologies, and network resources leads to increased threats of destabilization of the socio-political situation in view of the emergence of multiple centers that generate the ideological and psychological background. Keeping focused information policy can not be conceived without the collective participation of States in the first place, members of the group leaders of integration - Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. Currently, only produced a comprehensive approach to security in the information field in the Eurasian region, but the events in the world, largely thanks to modern technology, make the search for an exit strategy with a much higher speed. The article contributes to the science of international relations, engaging in interdisciplinary thinking that is associated with a transition period in the development of society. A study of current conditions in their relation to the current socio-political patterns of the authors leads to conclusions about the need for cooperation with the network centers of power in the modern information environment, the formation of alternative models of networking, especially in innovation and scientific and technical areas of information policy, and expanding the integration of the field in this region on the information content.