О возмещении убытков, причиненных обеспечением иска
This paper is primarily focused about how to resolve a case under the article 146 of the Civil procedural code of the Russian Federation when the defendant seeks a relief after an interlocutory injunction has been successfully applied against him. The article explores how such problems are reflected in the latest courts’ practice, especially on the complex cases of mixed procedure. The author critically assesses the possibility of a situation when the defendant asks the plaintiff to be excessively punished for his requests and emphasizes the doctrine of "a chilling effect": the discouragement of the legitimate exercise of a legal right by the threat of a legal sanction.
The article is devoted to the problem of contemporary transformation of status of deputy of parliament. The author analyses the grounds and procedures of bringing of the deputy to constitutional-law responsibility in the context of foreign experience of application of analogous procedures of deprivation of deputy's mandate.
The article deals with the issues of responsibility in civil procedural law from the point of theory and methodology of the contemporary jurisprudence. The article gives a new interpretation of the system of legal responsibility and the role of the civil procedural responsibility in this system. The mechanism of procedural responsibility is interpreted through the concept of contempt to court.
The already existing in the learned community manifold positions on the matter of the nature of the legal relationship in the enforcement proceedings are represented in the article.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/