The article is an attempt to clarify specific features of legal regulation of relations between Moscow State and Crimean Khanate – in particular, of attitude of their authorities towards the personal immunity of ambassadors. By two examples of the middle of the 17th cc. author examines on whom the rulers of both states laid the blame for such harm-doing and attempts to explain why authorities of Moscow and Crimea practiced different responsibility for offence against the ambassadorial law.
The collected abstracts of International Academic Conference “Chinggis Khaan and Globalization” devoted to the 850th anniversary of Chinggis Khan.
The paper examines the principles for the supervision of financial conglomerates proposed by BCBS in the consultative document published in December 2011. Moreover, the article proposes a number of suggestions worked out by the authors within the HSE research team.