Урнов М. Ю., Касамара В. А. В кн.: Современная Россия: вызовы и ответы. М.: Экспертиза, 2005. С. 66-128.
Added: Nov 8, 2012
Гловели Г. Дж. Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2010. № 11. С. 37-49.
Added: Oct 2, 2012
Can There Be Ethical Politics? Rethinking The Relationship Between European Geopolitics And Russian Eurasianism
Morozova N. International Relations. WP BRP. Высшая школа экономики, 2014. No. WP BRP 08/IR/2014.
This article aims to explicate the conceptual relationship between two intellectual traditions that informed Russian post-Soviet foreign policy discourse: European inter-war geopolitics and Russian post-revolutionary Eurasianism. It is argued that European geopolitics provided an important theoretical and normative point of departure for Russian Eurasians. The latter took issue with the politics of territorial expansionism underpinning European geopolitics. They therefore attempted to develop an idea of qualitatively different and better politics by subjugating politics to culture.
Added: Nov 21, 2014
Денчев К., Златев В. Sofia: Агроинженеринг, 2000.
Added: Sep 24, 2012
Баринов С. Л. В кн.: Мир и Россия: регионализм в условиях глобализации. М.: Издательство РУДН, 2010. С. 40-45.
Added: Oct 30, 2012
Поляков Л. В., Иоффе А. Н. М.: Просвещение, 2008.
Added: Sep 13, 2012
Денчев К. Новая и новейшая история. 2010. № 2. С. 39-58.
Added: Sep 21, 2012
Урнов М. Ю. Политическая теория и политический анализ. WP14. Высшая школа экономики, 2014
Russian political, analytical and scientific publications depict a future of the country mainly in a framework of the “Great Power paradigm”. This paradigm uses such an alternatives as Great Power versus Catastrophe (at times, Global), Great Power versus failed state, Great Power versus something foggy and dim (just as that-what-must-not-be-named), or fixes solely on one position – Great/leading power. The trouble is that it carries out a discussion on Russian future into a realm of irreality. The analysis of Russian resource capabilities shows that over the next decade, the country is likely to lose its Great power status. So the real dilemma of Russian political future is much more prosy and much more tragic than “Great Power versus Global Catastrophe”, it is an option between (at best) a regional power comfortable enough for its citizens and existing in its current borders and (at worst) a degradation and disintegration of the country. Meanwhile it is not so easy to achieve or even to come close to the best position. For this the country has to solve a lot of complicated tasks, including passing through the deep and painful consciousness revolution – that is to reject a mythology of its own greatness and elaborate a rational, critical view at its capabilities. Despite a gravity of choice between “a host of bitter truths” of reality and “an uplifting us illusion” of political mythology, the preference for “bitter truths” seems to be the only way to prevent the worst future scenario.
Added: Jan 16, 2015
Борусяк Л. Ф. В кн.: Школа и образование в Средние века и Новое время. М.: Наука, 2012. С. 397-422.
Added: Dec 3, 2012
Added: Nov 8, 2012
Комаров П. А. Безопасность Евразии. 2010. № 1. С. 332-341.
Added: Oct 4, 2012