Проблемы доказательств и доказывания при рассмотрении индивидуальных трудовых споров
Article is devoted to issues of evidence for individual labor disputes and assessment of substantiations by court.
Evidence based medicine became a reality during the end of 20 century, but its development makes visible a number of weaknesses of the scientific (evidence) base of medicine
Рublication was prepared on the basis of norms of the modern Russian legislation on labor disputes in accordance with state educational standards of higher professional education on the subject "Labor Law of Russia" (course "Labour disputes"). Its main aim is to help students in mastering the basic theoretical and practical knowledge and competences for the consideration and resolution of individual and collective labor disputes. Material contains general, special and peculiar parts. The general part deals with theoretical questions of labor disputes: concept, causes, law, principles, types and location of labor disputes in the labor law system. The special part contains sections on the procedure for dealing with individual and collective labor disputes, as well as the settlement of labor disputes certain categories of employees (civil servants, judges, prosecutors, foreign employees). Questions of foreign experience of labor disputes are considered in a special part of the tutorial. A special place is given to the problems of labor disputes and the prospects of development of Russian legislation on labor disputes.Each part includes relevant case studies (CBS and courts of general jurisdiction). For teachers, bachelors, masters and post-graduate law schools, as well as entrepreneurs, heads of organizations and personnel services, as well as those interested in labor disputes.
The article contains a comparative-juridical analysis of main regulations of the Russian and Mongolian criminal procedure codes. From the more detailed analysis of individual Mongolia CPC institutions follows the conclusion, that the order of judicial process is defined sequentially and logically from judicial-technical positions, it led to achievement goals of Mongolia criminal process.
The author substantiates the thesis that an arbitration court can reclaim from a party to the dispute evidence, that is necessary for the other party to ground its arguments and objections. If the court has reclaimed an evidence, and the party fails to submit it, such party is considered to have conceded facts, claimed by the other party.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/