?
Допустимость доказательств по соглашению сторон
The article is devoted to the discussion of the possibility de lege ferenda of concluding agreements on the confirmation of the circumstances of the dispute by certain means of proof (agreements on the admissibility of evidence). The paper examines the most significant arguments against this idea: limiting the possibilities for the court to establish the truth in the case, manipulating the court to achieve illegal goals, infringing on the interests of the weak side of the legal relationship, the discrepancy between the parties to the agreement on the admissibility of evidence and the composition of the persons involved in the case. The author comes to the conclusion that allowing the conclusion of such agreements from a procedural point of view is both permissible and desirable, as it would greatly simplify the evidentiary process for the parties to the process.