Эффективность взаимодействия «Деловой двадцатки» и «Группы двадцати»

Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. 2013. № 3. С. 92–114.

Larionova M. V., Rakhmangulov M., Sakharov A. G., Shelepov A. V., Ганжела В. Э., Журавлева А. Г., Зацепина К. В., Иванова Е. С., Каракаш Д. В., Комаров А. М., Костина М. К., Нурсубина Я. С., Прокопьев П. А., prokhorova A. A., Растольцев С. В., Skriba A.

The article reviews the progress of G20-B20 engagement since Toronto to St. Petersburg with the objective to identify which mechanisms and areas of cooperation are most effective to ensure continuity of the B20 efforts on the key priorities, the B20 influence on the G20 decision-making and the G20 compliance with commitments related to the B20 priorities. With this objective in mind the study is focused on two dimensions. The first dimension is B20 recommendations influence on G20 deliberation, direction setting and decision making on the basis of analysis of how the B20 specific recommendations are reflected in the G20 documents. The second dimension is B20 influence on G20 delivery on the pledges made, which is assessed by monitoring the G20 compliance with the B20 related commitments.

The authors assess the average level of the B20 recommendations reflection in the G20 documents as considerable, however its dynamics across presidencies is mixed. The average level of G20 members’ compliance on the B20 related commitments is lower than the G20 average score for compliance with general non B20 focused commitments. It can be explained by a shorter monitoring period and by the fact that the B20 related commitments are more specific. Key areas where cooperation can be most effective (financial regulation, employment, investments, trade) have been identified. Key factors of success have been revealed. The analysis shows that a high level of B20 recommendations’ inclusion into the G20 documents and actions does not guarantee subsequent implementation of the commitments made. The B20 should ensure continuity on their priority recommendations in the dialogue with the G20 and engage in the follow up process by more actively participating in the G20 agreed initiatives and projects at the national and global levels.

Progress on the B20 related commitment should be reviewed and made public for each summit. It can help to increase the level of effectiveness of B20 and G20 engagement.

Full report "From Toronto to Saint Petersburg: Assessing G20-B20 Engagement Effectiveness" is available at http://www.hse.ru/en/org/hse/iori/news/86843927.html

Keywords: трудовая занятость, инвестиции, продовольственная безопасность, G20, investments, эффективность деятельности международных институтов, "Группа двадцати", борьба с протекционизмом, борьба с коррупцией, food security, B20, international institutions activities’ effectiveness, jobs and employment, financial inclusion, fight with corruption, fight with protectionism, "Деловая двадцатка", расширение доступа к финансовым услугам