Принцип эстоппеля в гражданском праве как механизм предотвращения противоречивого поведения

Lex Russica (Русский закон). 2023. Т. 76. № 8. С. 52–66.

Якушева Е. Е.

The paper examines the legal nature of the estoppel principle, applied both as a result of unfair actions
of the party and because of the party’s inconsistent behavior. The paper analyzes the possibility of applying the
German principle of protestatio facto contraria (objection to the actual expression of will) and compares estoppel
and the continental law principle venire contra factum proprium.
The study classifies the rules of law regulating the application of the estoppel principle; two categories of norms
are distinguished, namely, the norms related to the prohibition of unfair actions and the norms aimed at preserving
the contract. The author compares the norms of the Russian civil legislation regulating the application of the
estoppel principle and highlights the conditions under which its application is allowed. The paper discusses the
possibility of applying the principle of estoppel in the absence of the party’s intentions to harm the counterparty.
The author analyzes the court practice related to the prohibition of contradictory behavior. In particular, the
author analyzes legal disputes caused by the parties’ references to the non-conclusion or invalidity of the contract,
as well as related to the inconsistent refusal of the party from the contract. Additionally, the author identified the
circumstances to be proved when referring the parties to the need to apply the estoppel principle.
Based on the results of the analysis, the author proposes options for improving legislative regulation of the
application of the estoppel principle. In particular, the author proposes to introduce the following criteria for
analyzing the need to apply the estoppel principle: the degree of validity and reasonableness of expectations
of the counterparty’s behavior; analysis of the counterparty’s behavior; a causal relationship between an
inconsistent behavior of the party and the damage caused to the relying party; the degree of damage caused to
the party as a result of the counterparty’s unscrupulous behavior.

Keywords: estoppel, venire contra factum proprium, protestatio facto contraria, принцип эстоппеля, анализ судебной практики, связанной с применением принципа эстоппеля, непоследовательность субъектов гражданских правоотношений, противоречивое поведение