Практический разум

Социологическое обозрение. 2021. Т. 20. № 3. С. 129–148.

Рикер П.

Translator: Бреус А. В.

Paul Ricœur’s essay “Practical Reason” was initially published in 1979, and later became part of the book Du texte à l’action: essais d’herméneutique II (1986), marking Ricœur’s transition from the general problems of the justification of hermeneutics as a legitimate philosophical discipline to the problems of practical philosophy in a broad sense. Relying on the analytical theory of action, the interpretative sociology of M. Weber, and the Hegelian critique of Kantian ethics, Ricœur seeks to restore the Aristotelian concept of phronesis or “practical wisdom” in the context of modern philosophizing. This turns out to be unexpectedly relevant where neither Kant’s deontology nor the Hegelian Sittlichkeit can adequately express the entirety of human practical experience in a world where ideology and alienation have become inevitable components of social life.

Keywords: идеология, герменевтика, М. Вебер, отчуждение, Aristotle, Аристотель, alienation, hermeneutics, Max Weber, понимающая социология, theory of action, теория действия, G.W.F. Hegel, deontology, деонтология, Phronesis, Г. В. Ф. Гегель, фронесис, практическая мудрость, ideology, interpretative sociology, practical wisdom, Immanuel Kant, practical reason, И. Кант, практический разум