?
Молодежь как барометр будущего? Молодежная повестка в современной России сквозь мнения экспертов по молодежной политике
Youth policy as a sphere of state administration is a national project based on a generational contract between the state and the youth. The state converts available resources into the socialization of the youth, ensuring the future development of the national state and society. The formation of the youth agenda involves employees of various
government agencies and institutions whose tasks include youth-related issues. Depending on priorities, youth
can be seen as a resource, an object of the national state, a significant agent, a subject, and an active participant in
social change. The degree of agency of various youth groups and their opportunities (rights) to influence significant decisions can be defined differently by experts, which forms different and contradictory visions of state youth policies and, accordingly, key projects aimed at the future of both the country and the youth. Based on the analysis of expert interviews (N = 30), the article aims to reconstruct the perceptions of the place and role of contemporary youth in the country’s future and the critical issues of the youth agenda as a whole. The article suggests an interpretation of three
divergent expert positions, among which tension and contradiction are found. The first is an optimistic view of the future, where the relationship between the state, represented by the Youth Policy, and the youth is considered a balanced dialogue based on a shared vision of Russia’s bright future and the place and role of youth in bringing it closer. This approach is typical of upper-level Youth Policy leaders and NGOs management located in the Capital. The second is a moderately worried view of youth and the country’s future, shared by the heads of state Youth Policy agencies and NGOs in the regions. The third expert position may be described as a critical and skeptical attitude
toward the key program documents of the Youth Policies and state rhetoric regarding youth. It is shared by experts in
the field — employees of municipal agencies and some regional NGOs and youth researchers from both the center and the regions. The article analyzes the lines of tension between conditional clusters of expert evaluations: from the center to the periphery, from the high-rank executives of the Youth Policy and subordinate bodies to local experts, from scholars to practitioners, from state structures to NGOs.