?
Плагиат в советской исторической науке второй половины 1940–1950-х годов
In science history one of the actual problems is the study of ethical issues of research activity. These issues include not only value orientations and virtues of academics, but also deviations from norms, conflicts, academic violations. This paperis devoted to the problem of plagiarism in Soviet historical science after 1945on the basis ofdocumentation materials from the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS).The article examines the conflicts of Soviet researches: N.M. Druzhinin, T.D. Shoinbaev, L.V. Cherepnin, A.M. Karasik, A.L. Sidorov, A.I. Gukovskiy, L.I. Zubok, I.S. Zvavich, P.Ya. Bukshpan and I.A. Fedosov.Therearestudiedthe issues ofspecial commissions that considered cases of plagiarism. In the article one of the keypoints is related to concept meaning of plagiarism in the scientific field. One of the main circumstances in commission'sexpertiseis related tofeatures of the academic genre/type of historiographical source, so the research is analyzed this problem too. There are defined two types of conscious unfair borrowing: textual plagiarism and plagiarism of ideas. Special attention is paid to the theme of punishment for intellectual theft. There are considered the requirements of the accusers, punishmentmeasures.Tosumitup, the forming of commissions is regarded as thereaction of research community to ethical conflicts, the attempt to resolve issues related to suspicion of plagiarism in academia. There is also noted the further perspective of this topic through the study of the motivation of scholars-plagiarists.