РОЛЬ И ЗНАЧЕНИЕ ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНОЙ ФОРМЫ В УСТАНОВЛЕНИИ ПРЕДМЕТА ДОКАЗЫВАНИЯ

Евразийский юридический журнал. 2019. № 9. С. 295–301.

Bekyasheva D.

The frequent change in procedural legislation still leaves open the question of creating such a model of civil justice, within which the interested person will be able to get not only the opportunity to exercise the right to judicial protection, but this implementation will be clear and transparent. The guarantor of access to justice is the procedure for instituting proceedings in court, and the guarantor of transparency is the process of forming the subject of facts. Today, the court partially reflects the facts of particular case on decree of the court (preparing the case for trial). These judicial acts sometimes present templates filled by the court that are not able to “shed light” on the composition of the facts to be proved at the hearing itself. It is necessary to create procedures, within the framework the actual composition of the case can be formed, in which the interested parties participate, allows them to be heard, optimizes the legal proceedings as a whole, will be a visual material for the courts of higher instances. The vivid confirmation of this is a historical and legal review set out by the author of the article.

Keywords: гражданский процесс, подготовка дела к судебному разбирательству, предмет доказывания, civil procedure, pretrial proceedings, система гарантий, эффективная судебная защита, fact in issue, fact to be proven, access to courts, right to judicial protection