?
Казус: Индивидуальное и уникальное в истории — 2020
The fifteenth and final issue of the almanac focuses on two related
topics. In the first section of "About freaks and people" we are talking about physical
cal otherness, in fact, inherent in some of the characters passed-
or only imaginary, i.e., interpreted as inferiority and moral
the existing idea of an author for whom "the Other" is not
only is scary, but is visualized in a similar way. The articles
in the second section "(Not)conscious error " tell about the misunderstandings with which
the historian is confronted in his work literally at every step. This includes
historiographical myths, misunderstood phrases and even individual words of
the source, and absurd, from the point of view of" canonicity", images. However, upon
closer examination, it turns out that the studies of the first and second sections of the
issue have a lot in common. An error in reading sometimes leads to the emergence of
a stable iconographic image (and a purely negative one), and Vice versa-
certain features of appearance are "read" by the author, and then "fit" them
in the source text. The third section of the issue "Young-green?» it is not related thematically to the
first two, but its value is different. At the end of its publication, the
Editorial Board decided to give the floor to those who may replace the current
generation of researchThe fifteenth and final issue of the almanac focuses on two related
topics. In the first section of "About freaks and people" we are talking about physical
cal otherness, in fact, inherent in some of the characters passed-
or only imaginary, i.e., interpreted as inferiority and moral
the existing idea of an author for whom "the Other" is not
only is scary, but is visualized in a similar way. The articles
in the second section "(Not)conscious error " tell about the misunderstandings with which
the historian is confronted in his work literally at every step. This includes
historiographical myths, misunderstood phrases and even individual words of
the source, and absurd, from the point of view of" canonicity", images. However, upon
closer examination, it turns out that the studies of the first and second sections of the
issue have a lot in common. An error in reading sometimes leads to the emergence of
a stable iconographic image (and a purely negative one), and Vice versa-
certain features of appearance are "read" by the author, and then "fit" them
in the source text. The third section of the issue "Young-green?» it is not related thematically to the
first two, but its value is different. At the end of its publication, the
Editorial Board decided to give the floor to those who may replace the current
generation of researchers-yesterday's and today's students who share an
interest in microhistory. It will also be discussed in the last, theoretical
section, the authors of which propose to "go back in the footsteps" of Russian microhistory, to
recall some of the key moments of its formation, largely related to
the almanac "Case", as well as to outline possible ways of its development.
For historians, cultural scientists, literary critics and a wide range of readers.The fifteenth and final issue of the almanac focuses on two related
topics. In the first section of "About freaks and people" we are talking about physical
cal otherness, in fact, inherent in some of the characters passed-
or only imaginary, i.e., interpreted as inferiority and moral
the existing idea of an author for whom "the Other" is not
only is scary, but is visualized in a similar way. The articles
in the second section "(Not)conscious error " tell about the misunderstandings with which
the historian is confronted in his work literally at every step. This includes
historiographical myths, misunderstood phrases and even individual words of
the source, and absurd, from the point of view of" canonicity", images. However, upon
closer examination, it turns out that the studies of the first and second sections of the
issue have a lot in common. An error in reading sometimes leads to the emergence of
a stable iconographic image (and a purely negative one), and Vice versa-
certain features of appearance are "read" by the author, and then "fit" them
in the source text. The third section of the issue "Young-green?» it is not related thematically to the
first two, but its value is different. At the end of its publication, the
Editorial Board decided to give the floor to those who may replace the current
generation of researchers-yesterday's and today's students who share an
interest in microhistory. It will also be discussed in the last, theoretical
section, the authors of which propose to "go back in the footsteps" of Russian microhistory, to
recall some of the key moments of its formation, largely related to
the almanac "Case", as well as to outline possible ways of its development.
For historians, cultural scientists, literary critics and a wide range of readers.ers-yesterday's and today's students who share an
interest in microhistory. It will also be discussed in the last, theoretical
section, the authors of which propose to "go back in the footsteps" of Russian microhistory, to
recall some of the key moments of its formation, largely related to
the almanac "Case", as well as to outline possible ways of its development.
For historians, cultural scientists, literary critics and a wide range of readers.
