К вопросу о верховенстве права в контексте российской внешней политики

С. 303–326.

Lukyanova E. A.

The author analyzes the features of the Russian law school, in particular, considering the difference in the interpretation of the "rule of law" and "law-bound state" concepts , the differences in lawyers mentality and circumstances of the experts selection process in competent state bodies.

As an example of the interpretation differences the author provides a detailed analyzes of the Russian Constitutional Court decision on the constitutionality of the treaty between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on the adoption of the Republic of Crimea to the Russian Federation and the formation of new subjects within the latter.

Keywords: гражданское общество, независимость судей, правовое государство, юриспруденция, civil society, ратификация, внешняя политика России, the rule of law, международное признание, законодательный процесс, legislative process, предмет и пределы проверки и оценки суда, верховенство права, международные стандарты, jurisprudence, парламент, судейское усмотрение, Конституционный суд, international standards, ratification, concept of law, понятие права, parliament, Constitutional court, Judicial Discretion, Russia's foreign policy, присоединение Крыма к России, law-bound state, positive law theory, legalism, independence of judges, Russian-Ukrainian relationships, Crimea-wide referendum, changed status of member territories, ational recognition, review bounds, review of international treaty yet to come into effect, позитивистская теория права, легистика, российско-украинские отношения, общекрымский референдум, изменение статуса субъектов, проверка не вступившего в силу международного договора

In book

Труды по россиеведению. Сборник научных трудов

Вып. 5. , М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2014.