?
Does Firms’ Rhetorical Nationalism Obscure Stock Price Informativeness? Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms
Leveraging information asymmetry theory, this study investigates whether rhetorical nationalism in corporate disclosures diminishes firm-specific price informativeness. Analyzing Chinese A-share data from 2010 to 2022, we develop a text-based index of rhetorical nationalism and find that firms employing stronger rhetoric exhibit greater stock price synchronicity. Forward-looking evidence supports an information environment channel: heightened rhetoric is associated with reduced linguistic specificity, increased analyst earnings forecast bias, and fewer negative media reports in the subsequent year, suggesting greater opacity and weaker firm-specific signals. This effect is amplified under stronger political intervention, higher tax incentives, and vaguer disclosure language. Economic consequence tests reveal that rhetorical nationalism undermines long-term firm value by distorting capital market information efficiency. Overall, our findings provide novel insights into the economic implications of political narratives in stock markets, offering a theoretical basis for regulators to refine guidelines for institutional investors and mitigate noise-driven trading in emerging markets.