Некоторые вопросы налогообложения предпринимательской и непредпринимательской деятельности учреждений образования
Пермь: Пермский государственный университет, 1994.
Клячко Т. Л. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2011. Т. 20. № 1. С. 88-124.
Added: Oct 2, 2012
Панкратова В. И., Хрешкова В. В. Гражданин и право. 2010. № 11. С. 73-84.
Added: Oct 7, 2012
Nikolaev D., Chugunov D. Washington: The World Bank, 2012.
This Education brief is intended for non-Russian researchers willing to get familiar with Russian education system and more generally for all those involved in education and education policy. It does not represent exhaustive information on Russian education system and all problems and challenges existing there, but provide a snapshot briefly describing its main features. Education brief - 2012 retains its main special feature which is the combination of statistical data and qualitative information to describe the organization and functioning of education system in the Russian Federation. The report provides an up-to-date array of indicators to measure the current state of education in the country. The indicators provide information on the human and financial resources invested in education, on how education and learning subsystems operate and evolve. The analytical parts of the report examine key problems and challenges faced by education system administrators and policymakers in education sphere.
Added: Jul 17, 2012
Правовое регулирование предпринимательской деятельности./ Учебное пособие. 3-е издание, исправленное и дополненное
Беляков В. Г. СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2008.
Added: Dec 3, 2012
Соболева И. В., Ремингтон Т. Ф., Соболев А. С. и др. Политическая теория и политический анализ. WP14. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. № 02.
Added: Sep 26, 2012
Жичкин А. М., Гурьянова С. Ю. М.: Московский государственный институт электроники и математики, 2010.
Added: Apr 12, 2012
Макарова Л. Г. В кн.: Бухгалтерский финансовый учет. М.: Вузовский учебник , 2010. Гл. 14. С. 425-469.
Added: Jul 4, 2012
Totyev K. Y. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2016. No. 2.
This paper explores business transactions in the context of the principle of legality. It will be argued that Article 168 of the Russian Civil Code, as a meta-rule, contains three types of rules: 1) rules dealing with the priority of special rule and exceptions (exclusive rules); 2) rules dealing with the interpretation of general, special and exclusive rules as well as with the requirements of statutes or other legal acts violated by a transaction and established outside Article 168 of the Civil Code; 3) rules dealing with the admissibility of special rule and exceptions, as well as with the conditions of admissibility of these rules. With regard to the first group of the rules, the legislature and commercial courts consider Article 168 of the Civil Code a common base with respect to other grounds in the Civil Code and in certain other statutes for declaring transactions invalid. According to the second group of rules, the subject-matter (object) of legal interpretation consists of two elements: а) the text of Article 168 of the Civil Code; and b) the texts of legal acts, described by the generic term “statute or other legal act.” Article 168 of the Civil Code provides instructions not only for rules as objects of application of the article, but also for the methods of interpreting violated requirements. The rules of admissibility for special rule and exceptions, as well as the conditions of admissibility for these standards, are aimed at the numerous cases in which the legislature, in the Civil Code or in other legal acts, expressly establishes nullity (voidness), voidability and other legal consequences for illegal transactions. The paper also answers questions regarding the impact of recent amendments to the Russian Civil Code on using rules for business transaction invalidity in commercial courts.
Added: Feb 27, 2016
Arefiev N., Барон Т. Ю. Научные доклады лаборатории макроэкономического анализа. WP12. Высшая школа экономики, 2007. No. 07.
We find optimal capital income tax rate in an imperfectly competitive economy, where some part of recourses is devoted to rent-seeking activity. Optimal tax offsets the difference between marginal social and marginal private return to capital, which is a result of rent seeking, and the difference between the before tax interest rate and the marginal productivity of capital, which arises from imperfect competition. Optimal capital income tax rate depends neither on other tax rates nor on overall tax burden. Numerically it is close to zero.
Added: Mar 14, 2013
Клевченкова М. Н. В кн.: Регистрация субъектов предпринимательской деятельности: зарубежный опыт. М.: Статут, 2012. Гл. 1.2. С. 49-79.
Added: Nov 30, 2012
Макеева О. С. В кн.: . С. 274-284.
Added: Jul 11, 2012
Андрощук В. В. Налоги и налогообложение. 2009. № 5. С. 59-62.
Added: Feb 2, 2013