Глава 37, параграф 1. Общие положения о подряде
Комментарий к Гражданскому кодексу Российской Федерации. Часть вторая (постатейный). 2-е издание / Под ред. А.П.Сергеева
Сергеев А. П., Абрамова Е. Н., Аверченко Н. Н. и др. М.: Издательство Проспект, 2017.
Юрина М. А. В кн.: Правопорядок у державному та суспільному розвитку: національний і міжнародний вимір: Збірник матеріалів юридичної науково-практичної Інтернет-конференції "Актуальна юриспруденція". К.: Актуальна юриспруденцiя, 2012. С. 200-205.
Added: Nov 23, 2012
Пишина С. Г. Н. Новгород: Стимул-СТ, 2011.
Added: Dec 12, 2012
Давыденко Д. Л. Вестник Высшего Арбитражного Суда Российской Федерации. 2008. № 12. С. 82-89.
Added: Jul 24, 2012
Гальперин М. Л. Закон. 2012. № 4. С. 40-57.
Added: Sep 4, 2012
Сухарева А. Е. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2017.
Added: Mar 2, 2018
Фогельсон Ю. Б. В кн.: Постатейный комментарий к Гражданскому кодексу Российской Федерации частей I, II и III. М.: Юрайт, 2005. Гл. 48.
Added: Nov 29, 2012
Poldnikov D. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2013. No. 16/LAW/2013.
The paper suggests several ways to rediscover the legacy of early modern and classical natural law of the 18th century in contemporary legal thought through the joint efforts of legal history and legal theory with particular reference to the domain of contract law. Additionally, the paper justifies the revival of the research in the domain of natural law in connection with legal argumentation.
Added: May 2, 2013
Фогельсон Ю. Б. М.: Юристъ, 2001.
Added: Dec 3, 2012
The functional method to study general part of contract law in historical perspective: pro et contra
Poldnikov D. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2018. No. 80.
Comparative legal history is a fashionable new discipline which aims at a better understanding of the law's past by comparing similarities and differences of legal phenomena in two or more jurisdictions beyond the limits of national legal histories. Despite its popularity in Europe, it still lacks comparative projects that cover both Western and Eastern areas of the Continent, not least because the methodology of such comparison requires proper consideration and cannot be simply copied from comparative law or national legal histories. The present article evaluates the applicability of the dominant method of today's comparative law (the functional one) in the domain of the general contract law of the first codifications in the major jurisdictions of Continental Europe (Austria, France, Germany, Russia) during the 'long 19th century'. This subject matter is chosen by way of example as a 'legal cross-road' of legal concepts and models, more susceptible to changes, innovations, borrowings, and closely linked to social needs. In the main part of the article, it is argued that the adaptation of the functional method to the needs of comparison in legal history becomes plausible due to at least two factors. First, comparatists mitigated the rigid assumptions of the 'classical' functionalism of the 20th century (rejecting its privileged status and purely functional perception of law, irrebuttable presumptions of similarity and unification of compared legal systems etc.). Second, many legal historians, like the drafters of the first civil codes in Western and Eastern Europe, also believe that law is more than minimally connected to social problems and manifests itself primarily through its actual application. On the basis of such premises, the author of this article discusses potential benefits and limitations of researching general contract law in the selected jurisdictions with the functional method. At the preparatory (descriptive) stage, it can be useful to assure comparability of contract law in the selected civil codes, to identify omissions in the codified general rules on contracts, and to arrange legal provisions around practically relevant issues. At the stage of analysis, functionalism can be coupled with teleological interpretation of legal norms to enable us to understand better the link between the application of the legal rules, their legal purposes, and the practical social problems serving as tertium comparationis for all the compared jurisdictions. A sketch of such an analysis in the final part of the article allows to conclude that a research with the help of the functional method narrows our perception of law as a cultural phenomenon and breaks the inner doctrinal logic, but in return, it offers a starting point for a much needed dialogue of legal historians with a wider legal community.
Added: Apr 10, 2018
Savelyev A. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2016
The paper analyzes legal issues associated with application of existing contract law provisions to so-called Smart contracts, defined in the paper as “agreements existing in the form of software code implemented on the Blockchain platform, which ensures autonomy and self-executive nature of Smart contract terms based on predetermined set of factors”. The paper consists of several sections. In the first section, the paper outlines peculiarities of Blockchain technology as currently implemented in Bitcoin cryptocurrency and which forms the core of Smart contracts. In the second section, the main characteristic features of Smart contracts are described. Finally, the paper outlines key tensions between classic contract law and Smart contracts.. The conclusion section sets the core question for analysis of the perspectives of implementation of this technology by governments: “How to align the powers of the government with Blockchain if there is no central authority but only distributed technologies”. The author suggests two solutions, which are not optimal: 1) providing the state authorities with the status of a Superuser with extra powers and 2) relying on traditional remedies and enforcement practices, by pursuing specific individuals – parties to Smart contract - in offline mode. It is emphasized that those jurisdictions, which have the most Blockchain-friendly regulations will have competitive advantage in attraction of new innovative business models and companies willing to exploit them in a legal way.
Added: Dec 22, 2016
Подготовка сотрудников органов внутренних дел противодействию преступлениям против интеллектуальной собственности
Козлов А. В. В кн.: Вопросы гражданского права в деятельности правоохранительных органов: Материалы Международной научно-практической конференции (Нижний Новгород, 23 мая 2012 года). Н. Новгород: Нижегородская академия МВД России, 2012. С. 264-276.
Added: Dec 10, 2012