13 December 2018
13 December 2018
12 December 2018
The results of the Russian Census of 2010 lay on the table several topics requiring further discussion. Prerequisites for this discussion are the change of the administrative-territorial structure of Russia after the reform of municipal government in 2006 and the amendments to the Census Law made prior to Census 2010. During 2002-2010 increase in rural population was almost twice higher than that in urban areas: +11% and +6.3% correspondingly. Rural population increased up to 30-50% in some municipalities, while changes of the urban population were fairly minor or even negative over the intercensal period. This significant rise in the rural population could be related with changes concerning data capture of the population living in collective households. This ‘non-demographic’ factor distorts denominator for demographic rates for municipalities, affects on an allocation budget funds depending on the population in the municipality.
The edition includes two documents. The first one contains a list of 17 questions that users of the survey data should be asked to draw conclusions about the validity of the results. The proposed system of criteria is applicable to assess the quality of the results of almost any survey. The second paper deals with qualities of the data, which the social media are ready to provide the students of public opinion. Both documents were prepared by the AAPOR working group on emerging technologies (Emerging Technologies Task Force), whose activities had to focus on two key areas: (1) smartphones as devices data collection, (2) social media as a platform and information resource.
Интернет-опрос, онлайн-опрос, репрезентативность и смещения выборки в онлайн-исследованиях, фрилансеры, контроль за ходом опроса, коммуникация в Интернете
In 2006, Russia amended its competition law and added the concepts of ‘collective dominance’ and its abuse. This was seen as an attempt to address the common problem of ‘conscious parallelism’ among firms in concentrated industries. Critics feared that the enforcement of this provision would become tantamount to government regulation of prices. In this paper we examine the enforcement experience to date, looking especially closely at sanctions imposed on firms in the oil industry. Some difficulties and complications experienced in enforcement are analysed, and some alternative strategies for addressing anticompetitive behaviour in concentrated industries discussed.