XVIII век как зеркало других. XVIII век в зеркале других эпох
In terms of interaction, Russian and Chinese cultures are considered as semiotic spheres to study. The article demonstrates the study of three ‘waves’ of Russian-Chinese intercultural communication, three periods of strengthening and developing of the dialog between the two cultures: the 20ies, 50ies of the XXth century as well as the boundary XXth-XXIst centuries. The article reveals the role of dominant meanings and images in the intercultural dialog as it develops.
The financial crisis has revived interest in economic scholarship from a historical perspective. This volume studies the interconnection between economic thought and economic policy from the mid-nineteenth century to the interwar period. It examines how the German Historical School’s ideas spread and was interpreted in different European countries, including Russia, between 1850 and 1930, analysing its legacies in these countries. In doing so, the book is able to trace the interconnection between economic thought and economic policy, adding new voices to the debate on the diffusion of ideas and flow of knowledge.
The focus of this article is on a specific aspect of the recent state of historical research in Russia: the problem of universalization (cognitive and institutional) of Russian historical studies and recognition of the Russian scholars’ knowledge claims. Cognitive aspects of the “restructuring” of science, research themes, the state of the disciplinary community and communicative strategies, position of historians in the humanities establishment and relationships with the authorities are studied based on the concepts of centre-periphery and cultural transfer.
This paper is aimed to identify theoretical problems, which arise when studying the preconditions of and obstacles to the participation of the Russian historians in international scientific discussion. The key question is why, how and when the new historical knowledge developed by the Russian scholars became-or, as an extreme case, have not become-part of global scientific heritage. Discussion of ‘presence’ in the global science is connected not so much with the aftermath of autarchy during the socialist period as with the difficulties of adapting to new conditions of existence as a ‘normal’ discipline and the rigors of being a ’poor‘ science. In this article we review not only specifics of the transfer of knowledge produced by Russian historians, but also specifics of reception preceding it.
This article tells the story of the reception of Lydia Ginzburg prose by the younger generation and of the changes in her reputation provoked in 2011 by the latest publication of Ginzburg's previously unknown prose of the 1940s. The first phase of the reception was characterized by the predominance of an immediate and integrative approach, while the second phase is characterized by a historical distantiation of the reader and by a discrimination of various heterogeneous lavers in Ginzburg's prose. A special stress is made on a dramatic contradiction between two trends in Ginzburg's prose: a trends towards the creation of an "in-between prose" and an other semi-hidden trend towards the creation of a modern novel in the spirit of Proust.
The paper is focused on the study of reaction of italian literature critics on the publication of the Boris Pasternak's novel "Doctor Jivago". The analysys of the book ""Doctor Jivago", Pasternak, 1958, Italy" (published in Russian language in "Reka vremen", 2012, in Moscow) is given. The papers of italian writers, critics and historians of literature, who reacted immediately upon the publication of the novel (A. Moravia, I. Calvino, F.Fortini, C. Cassola, C. Salinari ecc.) are studied and analised.
In the article the patterns of the realization of emotional utterances in dialogic and monologic speech are described. The author pays special attention to the characteristic features of the speech of a speaker feeling psychic tension and to the compositional-pragmatic peculiarities of dialogic and monologic text.