Государственный и муниципальный контроль (надзор) в отношении граждан: нормативное регулирование и реализация на практике
The book is prepared on the basis of the materials of the interuniversity conference (a meeting of theorists of law) dedicated to the 200th anniversary of the birth of Karl Marx. Although the articles presented in this book do not reflect the entire richness of the creative legacy of the young Marx, they lead readers into the world of realities of statehood of the mid-19th century and their subsequent evaluations (up to the present time) by the representatives of different philosophical and theoretical doctrines. The efforts of the conference organizers, authors and compilers of the collection are aimed at understanding the world scientific and legal heritage and its role in modern society, as well as at solving practical problems to overcome social crises, involving the search for answers at the General theoretical level, which allows to build an adequate legal policy, to determine the vectors of effective and sustainable development of the state. The book is prepared for everyone who is interested in problems of law and justice and, in particular, for those young researchers, masters and graduate students who comprehend the history of legal thought
The article is devoted to the problem of mutual correlation between individual and political freedom in the context of ethical, legal and political legitimation of the state. The method - hermeneutical reconstruction and comparative analysis of the state philosophy by Kant, Hegel and Husserl. As a result of hermeneutic reconstruction of Kant’s state philosophy, there are revealed four constitutional factors: the principle of freedom, republicanism, the principle of membership and legality. Kant makes a distinction between noumenal (moral) and phenomenal (political-legal) freedom, emphasizing that in the sphere of politics and law, nominal freedom cannot become the basis of moral law, since it should not be limited from the outside (heteronomically), but only be relied upon by the individual “from within” (autonomously). For Kant, noumenal freedom is the only right initially given to each person on the basis of his belonging to the human race (natural low). The political community, represented by the state, is authorized only to protect this freedom from external coercion, but has no right to encroach on the restriction of internal (nominal) human freedom. Kant chooses the Republic as preferred form of government, since the law is the final authority. As a result of the comparative analysis of Kant’s and Hegel's state philosophy, the author comes to the conclusion that both thinkers are unanimous in understanding freedom as a basis for state legitimization. At the same time, Hegel “removes” Kant's established distinction between nominal and phenomenal freedom and takes as a basis the collective, universal freedom of the state, which embodies objectivity, truth and morality. The highest ideal and duty of the individual is to renounce autonomy in the name of the state, which is defined as a divine end in itself. Hegel picks up the ethical strategy of Kant's interpretation of the state and complementing it with two others: the understanding of the state as a result of natural teleology (the purpose of nature) and as a result of reasonable teleology (conscious and free choice of human). Hegel prefers monarchy as preferred form of government. Husserl, following Kant, develops and consistently radicalizes ethical and instrumentalist understanding of the state, emphasizing its transitory nature and focusing on the self-realization of a free, phenomenologically reflective individual. However, the freedom of the individual phenomenologist is limited by attachment to the phenomenological and contains rudiments of natural and intelligent teleology in the spirit of Hegel. Although phenomenology, in Husserl's understanding, is neither a “state philosophy” nor a purely personal practice, it acquires the specific nature of the intellectual aristocracy: the phenomenological movement and the community of phenomenologists represent the ideal completion of the political history of European humanity.
The book explores the issues of the general part of the criminal law as applied to economic crimes. The author espouses the idea of the economic criminal law as an independent sub-branch of the criminal law and systematically analyzes the criminogenic elements of the relevant crimes, the specifics of objective and subjective elements of crimes, stages of crime, complicity in crime, valid defenses, and punishment. The monograph is based on the modern criminal and other law of the Russian Federation (as of September 1, 2018), the law of the foreign countries, legal precedents, and doctrinal sources.
The book will be useful for scholars and practitioners, undergraduate and graduate students of law schools, as well as for the business community and all interested in the modern problems of the criminal law.
We address the external effects on public sector efficiency measures acquired using Data Envelopment Analysis. We use the health care system in Russian regions in 2011 to evaluate modern approaches to accounting for external effects. We propose a promising method of correcting DEA efficiency measures. Despite the multiple advantages DEA offers, the usage of this approach carries with it a number of methodological difficulties. Accounting for multiple factors of efficiency calls for more complex methods, among which the most promising are DMU clustering and calculating local production possibility frontiers. Using regression models for estimate correction requires further study due to possible systematic errors during estimation. A mixture of data correction and DMU clustering together with multi-stage DEA seems most promising at the moment. Analyzing several stages of transforming society’s resources into social welfare will allow for picking out the weak points in a state agency’s work.