Запрет двойного привлечения к ответственности (non bis in idem) в фокусе конституционно-судебной интерпретации

Журнал конституционного правосудия. 2023. № 1. С. 4–9.

Igumnov N.

In the article, the author addresses the problem of determining the content of the prohibition of double prosecution established by the Constitution of the Russian Federation (Article 50, part 1). On the basis of the practice of enshrining the non bis in idem rule in foreign and international legal regulation, the author notes that the exhaustive meaning of this rule cannot be considered established. Analysis of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation provides for to conclude that the scope of the constitutional prohibition double prosecution for the one and the same crime is not limited by the scope of literal meaning of part 1 of Article 50 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and explicit legislative provisions, that prohibit double prosecution. In addition, the article concludes that the actual content of the constitutional prohibition of double prosecution is determined by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation through an autonomous interpretation based on the principles of equality, fairness, legal certainty.

Keywords: Конституционный Суд Российской Федерации, non bis in idem, запрет двойного привлечения к ответственности, автономное значение