Ачкасов Ю. К., Шатило Е. Ю. Научный вестник ИЭП им. Гайдара.ру (электронный журнал). 2016. № 1. С. 53-55.
Added: Apr 26, 2017
Труд и трудовые отношения в современной России: культурные особенности, гендерные и социально-экономические аспекты (Обзор)
Долгов А. Ю. Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Серия 11: Социология. Реферативный журнал. 2018. № 1. С. 31-42.
Added: Oct 2, 2018
Added: Jun 1, 2013
Androuschak G., Yudkevich M. M. In bk.: Paying the Professoriate: A Global Comparison of Compensation and Contracts. L.: Routledge, 2012. Ch. 25. P. 265-278.
How are professors paid? Can the "best and brightest" be attracted to the academic profession? With universities facing international competition, which countries compensate their academics best, and which ones lag behind? Paying the Professoriate examines these questions and provides key insights and recommendations into the current state of the academic profession worldwide. Paying the Professoriate is the first comparative analysis of global faculty salaries, remuneration, and terms of employment. Offering an in-depth international comparison of academic salaries in twenty-eight countries across public, private, research, and non-research universities, chapter authors shed light on the conditions and expectations that shape the modern academic profession. The top researchers on the academic profession worldwide analyze common themes, trends, and the impact of these matters on academic quality and research productivity. In a world where higher education capacity is a key driver of national innovation and prosperity, and nations seek to fast-track their economic growth through expansion of higher education systems, policy makers and administrators increasingly seek answers about what actions they should be taking. Paying the Professoriate provides a much needed resource, illuminating the key issues and offering recommendations
Added: Jul 9, 2012
М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2008.
Added: Jun 1, 2013
Гимпельсон В. Е., Капелюшников Р. И. В кн.: Заработная плата в России: эволюция и дифференциация. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2008. Гл. 1. С. 18-96.
Added: Jun 1, 2013
From salary to the performance-based remuneration of russian physicians: how motivation at work is changing.2018. - 25 с.
Shishkin S., Temnitsky A. Public and Social Policy. WP BRP Series. НИУ ВШЭ, 2017
The paper examines the changes in the physician’s motivation at work during the period of reforms the salary system started since 2008. These reforms have included a shift from fixed salary system to pay for performance remuneration as well as sufficient increase of salary. The data of six surveys of health workers implemented in 2007-2016 were used to reveal the hierarchy of physician’s motives at work and to track their changes during the period of time under consideration. The changes were minor, and the directions of these changes were rather opposite to the expected strengthening of financial motivation at work: the importance of the motive of earning money has moved from the first place. The share of doctors willing to work more and better on the condition of linking salary with labor contribution did not increase. In contrast, almost two-thirds of physicians believe that they are working on a high level of quality and performance. The majority of physicians desire to increase not a stimulating part of the salary but a base, fixed one. Doctors who receive bonuses for the intensity, quality and performance, and who have a higher amount of salary wish to see the share of fixed part of salary higher than it is now available. This is a clear indication of orientation of this professional to strengthening the protective function of the salary rather than to use increased opportunities for earning money.
Added: Jun 23, 2017
Vakulenko E. Economics/EC. WP BRP. Высшая школа экономики, 2014. No. 53.
We analyze the impact of migration on wage, income and the unemployment rate. Using the official Russian statistical database from 1995 to 2010, we calculate a dynamic panel data model with spatial effects. There is a positive spatial effect for wage, income and unemployment rate. There is no significant impact of migration on the unemployment rate. We find a negative relationship between net internal migration and both wages and income, which is explained by the positive effect of emigration and negative effect of immigration for income. However, the migration benefits are not big enough to make a difference on the Gini index across regions. We conclude that migration does not affect the regional sigma-convergence of economic indicators.
Added: Feb 14, 2014