Нарушение принципов равноправия и состязательности как основание для отмены судебных актов арбитражных судов в кассационном порядке

Закон. 2021. № 7. С. 70–80.

Ilyin A.

The article examines the question of whether such violations of the rules of procedural law by the arbitration courts of the first and appellate instance, which together can be designated as a violation of the principles of adversariality and equality of the parties, can be considered as a violation of the principles of adversariality and equality of the parties - an illegal ban on a party to provide evidence, an illegal refusal to assist in reclaiming evidence that is missing from a party failure to provide a party with the opportunity to familiarize itself with the evidence of the other party in a timely manner, acceptance of evidence in violation of the law, while prohibiting the other party to provide evidence to the contrary, lead to the cancellation of judicial acts in the arbitration court of the cassation instance. The analysis is carried out on the basis of comparing the limits of the consideration of the case in the cassation instance, the powers of the arbitration court of the cassation instance, as well as the grounds for canceling or changing judicial acts in cassation. The classic problem of cassation proceedings about what constitutes a check by the court of the cassation instance of the discrepancy between the conclusions contained in the contested judicial acts, the factual circumstances established in the case or the evidence available in the case is subject to special analysis.

Keywords: кассационное производство, доказывание, принцип состязательности, конституционный принцип равноправия, proof, cassation proceedings, the scope of consideration of the case in the cassation instance, the powers of the arbitration court of the cassation instance, the principle of equality, the principle of adversariality, пределы рассмотрения дела в кассационной инстанции, полномочия арбитражного суда кассационной инстанции