Россия и Римский статут: к истории отношений
The Article is concerned with recent history of relations between Russia and the Rome Statute. Such history began in the 1990s, during the preparatory stages for the Statute’s enactment, and officially ended in 2016. During this period of time, there were changing attitudes to the Statute, attempts to ratify it, proposals to change national legislation with regard to international crimes. The author concentrates on official positions as to the Statute and connected scholar and political views. The main assumption proposed in the Article is that the relations with the Statute (and of course with the International Criminal Court) were subject for political considerations. There were no significant legal and public discussion as to its ratification, implementation or rejection. Despite the formal rejection of the Statute to this moment, it surely will influence at least scholar discussion on international criminal law matters in the future.
Professor Hans-Hajnrih Eshek has protected the thesis for a doctor's degree in 1949 in Tjubingen on a theme: «Responsibility of state structures on the international criminal law - researches in connection with the Nuremberg process»; has created the concept of a uniform roof of Institute of foreign and international criminal law of Max Planck. His organizing work has come to the end in 2007 with creation of "the International research school of comparative criminal law» and criminological school for doctoral candidates «infl uence Measures, mediation and punishment». Approximately 600 works devoted to the General part of criminal law, to punishments, measures of correction and safety, the Especial part, and also criminally-procedural right is published by him.
The author analyzes the features of the Russian law school, in particular, considering the difference in the interpretation of the "rule of law" and "law-bound state" concepts , the differences in lawyers mentality and circumstances of the experts selection process in competent state bodies.
As an example of the interpretation differences the author provides a detailed analyzes of the Russian Constitutional Court decision on the constitutionality of the treaty between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on the adoption of the Republic of Crimea to the Russian Federation and the formation of new subjects within the latter.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/