Между Господом и господином: дискурс боли в текстах Ф. Достоевского: политико-культурное измерение
This article is an attempt to study the discourse of pain as a product of human activity rebellious man. From the point of view of the author, the reasons of the ambivalent behavior, characteristic of Russian culture can be explain of rebellion behavior. Inexplicable and sanctuary of a single rebellious person starts projected on the culture itself, formed with the help of cultural products such rebellious people. Using literary texts by Dostoevsky, the author tries to consider how in a particular subject alternates desire to carry out the punishment and repression, and the need for experience and a shame for the act committed. The author believes that in such moments in the subject at the same time conflict with each other Master (cold and ruthless) and God (warm, tending to Love and Sacrifice). Rebellious man doubles in his quest to be the same as God, to suffer for other people, and the master, able to send the violence and implement the repressive acts. Duality of Russian culture largely affects the duality of the pain. Discourse pain texts Dostoevsky revealed in numerous situations actualization pain. The author believes that the subject is in a situation of choice between two strategies. From the point of view of the author, the pain may be due to implemented violence against any victim or be the consequence of acquiring own. The subjects are the carriers of Russian culture presented in the mysterious image of the hero of Dostoevsky. In this article, the author talks about the factors contributing to the transformation of energy in the protest cultural products. From the point of view of the author, the problems exposed by Fyodor Dostoevsky, fully projected onto the real political and cultural practices.