• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Article

Плеснер vs Хайдеггер: проблема экзистенции

Философские науки. 2013. № 7. С. 65-78.

This paper is dedicated to the comparative analysis of existential ontological concepts of M. Heidegger and H. Plessner from the perspective of philosophical anthropology. Unlike Heidegger, whose doctrine of human existence required the analysis of a priori structures of existence to precede the disclosure of the sense of being, Plessner refutes the existential ontological substantiation of the whole world-view in the pre-empirical anthropology as in the doctrine of «being-consciousness». According to Plessner, the philosophy of man is impossible without the philosophy of nature, as far as the human mode of existence can be perceived only as a mode of being of a natural entity. Therefore the subject of philosophy should not be the theoretical, but the «living», or
natural, existence.