?
Kinchouka Gurobaru Rikkenshugi - Ajia ni okeru Houhenyou no Ta-ningu Pointo to Moderu Toshite no Roshia no Kenpou Kaikaku
For understanding Asian constitutionalism the simple value-oriented approach is not productive, because the result of investigation is in some way premised by the research hypothesis itself with quite predictable outcome – by definition this type of constitutionalism differ from Western ideal model, demonstrate more variability, deviances and inconsistences regarding the adoption of the rule of law standards. There is nothing new in this conclusion. More interesting is the question about cognitive motivation and internal logic of decision-making process in the adoption of different constitutional strategies and forms of their implementation in the real world of international and domestic politics. Why this logic of constitutional engineering is so mobile, and whether cognitive motives are really matter for projecting structures, incentives and outcomes of constitutional process of different global regions, countries?
From this comparative point of view we will try to understand the role of the 2020 Russian constitutional reform for the Eurasian, Asian and global constitutional development.