?
"ТРУДНАЯ ПРОБЛЕМА" ЛЕНИНСКОЙ ТЕОРИИ ОТРАЖЕНИЯ: ДИСКУССИИ 1930-1950-Х ГОДОВ
This article discusses the versions of Leninist re ection theory in the Russian philosophy of the rst half of the twentieth century. The very nature of the discussions made the problem of understanding the features of the theory of cognition a “hard” problem. This was facilitated by the ideological and political impurities characteristic of philosophical inquiry at the time. The “diamat” (short for “dialectical materialism”) re ection theory is compared with M.A. Lifshits’s “ontognoseology”. The task is to show the process of dogmatization of Lenin’s re ection theory in the discussions of the 30s-40s, as well as the transformation of this theory in Lifshits’s ontognoseology in the 1940-50s. The article highlights the variations of re ection theory in the Soviet philosophy of 1930-70s. This theory in Diamat is considered in comparison with the “ontognoseology” of Mikhail Lifshits. The ideological catalyst for the development of the “Leninist re ection theory” was the principle of partisanship...