Обеспечение иска по делам о нарушении прав на объекты интеллектуальной собственности

Экономика. Право. Общество. 2017. № 4 (12). С. 105–113.

Шичанин М. А.

Coordination between territorially limited intellectual property rights and global Internet activities has

always been the focus of attention. The liability of Internet intermediaries offering potentially global

services that may facilitate infringements of intellectual property rights by others in multiple countries

poses a particular challenge in that regard. At a substantive law level, significant differences remain

between jurisdictions regarding secondary liability for intellectual property rights infringements and

maintaining safe position of Internet intermediaries. This article discusses the conflict of laws aspects of

the liability of Internet intermediaries in light of the recent international efforts to adopt «soft law

provisions» in the field of intellectual property and private international law. In addition, the author

emphasizes that it is often difficult to apply the conflicting norms (lex fori, lex loci protectionis) to legal

relations arising in the Internet, which are usually used to overcome conflicts in law.

Keywords: интеллектуальная собственность, международное частное право, internet, intellectual property, conflict of laws, коллизионные нормы, conflict norms, international private law, intermediaries, посредники, информационный посредник, Интернет, secondary liability, safe harbors, information intermediary, conflict binding, вторичная ответственность, безопасное положение, коллизии в законах, коллизионная привязка