Человек в контексте традиционной культуры: метапозиция и диалог между исследователями разных наук

Обсерватория культуры. 2019. Т. 16. № 4. С. 349–361.

Obukhov A., Овчинникова Ю. С., Ткаченко Н. В.

The article is devoted to the problem of or- ganization of a productive dialogue between represent- atives of different sciences during the comprehensive interdisciplinary research of man in the context of tra- ditional culture. The prerequisites to the given prob- lem statement have been formed during a long-term experience of joint field studies made by the authors in Russia (Adygea, Russian North, Bashkiria, Buryat- ia, Kabardino-Balkaria, North Ossetia, Khakassia, Ya- kutia and other regions) and Mexico, as well as through the analysis of relevant results of academic and re- search work. As a solution of the given task, the authors develop the methodological construction “metaposi- tion” that allows to approach to complexity and inter- disciplinarity of research through the principle of dia- logue in the common sociocultural field. Metaposition as a technology of organization of polyprofessional co- operation of different experts in a common research space is aimed at development of scientists’ skills of fix- ation, systematization and representation of the re- sults of their work taking into account positions of their colleagues from other subject areas. Realization of this technology leads to creation of a metalanguage and to widening of researcher’s scientific culture (theoreti- cal frames of each expert, style of their scientific reason- ing and personal qualities). The development of meta- position as a stable system of cooperation between different positions of researchers suggests three inter- related stages: defining the research’s common field; re- vealing the borders of scientific positions; constructing the interpositional dialogue. Opportunities of applica- tion of the methodological construction “metaposition” at different stages of field research (before the field, at the field, after the field, during analysis of the field data) are concretized through a relevant algorithm and sup- ported by examples from the field practice.

Keywords: этнопсихология, культурология, cultural practices, культурные практики, визуальная антропология, ethnopsychology, field research, полевые исследования, methodology of science, методология науки, visual anthropology, cultural studies, психологическая антропология, комплексное исследование, metaposition, man in the context of traditional culture, psychological anthropology, interdisciplinary dialogue, метапозиция, человек в контексте традиционной культуры, междисциплинарный диалог