?
Юрисдикционные иммунитеты иностранных государств в контексте признания и приведения в исполнение решений международных инвестиционных арбитражей
recognition and enforcement of international investment arbitration awards against a foreign state in Russian courts raises a whole range of complex legal issues related to jurisdictional immunities of foreign states. As a sui generis court proceeding, the recognition and enforcement of arbitral award against a foreign state affects both immunity from jurisdiction and immunity from execution of the latter. Entering into arbitration agreement does not mean per se the express consent of state to jurisdiction of foreign courts in proceedings concerning recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, although this point of view is actively challenged by the those who rely on concept of "implied waiver" from state immunity that is spreading in Western jurisdictions. The adoption of measures of constraint against foreign state aimed at execution of an arbitral award creates serious risks for the stability and comity in international relations and requires a very cautious and balanced approach that should also take into account alternative mechanisms for execution of international investment arbitration awards.