Global Governance of Antitrust and the need for a BRICS Joint Research Platform in Competition Law and Policy

P. 51–114.

Lianos I.

The chapter offers a critical analysis of the call for policy convergence in competition law, which merely emanates from the global business community and enables established competition law regimes, such as that of the US and Europe, to influence the convergence point and more generally to take ownership of the process of global convergence of competition law. The chapter criticizes this state of affairs for not taking into account the different patterns of diffusion of competition law and consequently the variety of competition law systems emerging out of the original US antitrust law model and its EU competition law “spin-off”. In particular, it castigates the lack of participation in this global deliberative space of emergent and developing economies and the inability of various affected interests, beyond global businesses and, to a limited extent, consumers, to be considered. The study takes a broader perspective and puts forward a “participation-centred” approach that would seek to avoid both majority and minority biases, the ultimate objective being not policy convergence as such, but increasing levels of total trust between competition authorities and between competition authorities and their stakeholders. The BRICS Joint Research Platform may play an important role in contributing to the establishment of this new architecture of global governance of competition law.

Keywords: BRICS, trust, global governance, Policy convergence, Global Competition Law and Economics, 4th BRICS International Competition Conference

Publication based on the results of: Правовая политика и вызовы глобального развития . Интеллектуальная собственность для общественного и экономического развития. Антимонопольное регулирование в новой экономике. Глобальные институты и регулирование финансовой системы (2015)

In book

Competition Policy for the New Era

NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.