Article
Зачем оружие?
Россия в глобальной политике. 2012. Т. 10. № 5. С. 8-22.
Publication based on the results of:
Conceptual basis and evolution of economic, political and military relations of Russia and the United States in terms of global economic and political transformation(2013)
Similar publications
Никитин А. И. В кн.: Научно-методологические вопросы международной безопасности. Известия, 2014. С. 109-112.
Added: Jan 15, 2015
Suslov D. International Relations. IR. Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2012. No. 01.
The contemporary Russian military-industrial complex to a great extent still remains a shortened and shrinking copy of the old Soviet military machine, which is less and less capable of defending Russia from the real threats and challenges and stimulates ineffective spending of financial resources. The reason is that the logic of the Russian defense policy, which determines structure of the military-industrial complex, did not change since the Cold War. This logic is strategic deterrence of the US. Today more factors objectively unite Russia and the US in the world rather than separates them. However, Moscow is still committed to maintaining a parity (or at least an illusion of parity) with the US in the strategic nuclear sphere and regards it as a criteria for its military security and maintenance of a great power status.
Added: Jan 17, 2013
Братерский М. В. В кн.: VIII Международная научная конференция. Модернизация экономики и общественное развитие: В 3 кн.. Кн. 3. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2007. С. 405-418.
Added: Oct 1, 2013
Савченко Д. В. Безопасность Евразии. 2009. № 3. С. 365-376.
Added: Mar 23, 2013
Братерский М. В. В кн.: Модернизация экономики и глобализация: В 3 кн. Кн. 3.. Кн. 3. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2009. С. 362-370.
Added: Aug 20, 2013
Вып. 1. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2009.
Added: Oct 27, 2012
Aistov A. Education. EDU. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 5.
This research focuses on estimating the signalling role of education on the Russian labour market. Two well-known screening hypotheses are initially considered. According to first of these, education is an ideal filter of persons with low productivity: education does not increase the productivity of a person, but it does give him the possibility to signal about his innate productivity via an educational certicate. The second of these hypotheses admits that productivity actually does increase during the period of study, but nevertheless the main objective of getting an education is to acquire a signal about one's productivity. Information theory suggests that employees use education signals during the hiring processes whereby employers screen potential employees. Employers and other categories of self-employed workers are usually not screened by the labour market via their educational attainments. Comparison of the returns to education of employees vs. self-employed workers could show the difference between the returns to signals and the returns to human capital. Yet another way to understand the signals is to consider the time dynamics of the returns to education for employees staying in the same firm. This helps us to answer the question about whether the signals are valuable only during the hiring process, or whether they remain valuable during the whole experience with the firm. This research is based on the Mincerian-type earnings functions, estimated on RLMS-HSE and NOBUS data. On the basis of the available information, we cannot say that the returns to signals and human capital differ significantly in Russia. Nevertheless we can say that, for the majority of men, the return to educational signals decreases with time spent in the same firm, while we observe the opposite for women.
Added: May 15, 2012
Черных А. И. Политическая теория и политический анализ. WP14. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. № 03.
Added: May 3, 2012
Мукомель В. И. Демоскоп Weekly. 2011. № 479-480.
Added: Sep 10, 2013
Новичков Н. В. Вестник Московского государственного университета культуры и искусств. 2011. № 4. С. 22-30.
This article is talking about state management and cultural policy, their nature and content in term of the new tendency - development of postindustrial society. It mentioned here, that at the moment cultural policy is the base of regional political activity and that regions can get strong competitive advantage if they are able to implement cultural policy successfully. All these trends can produce elements of new economic development.
Added: Sep 13, 2012
Вып. 1. М.: Некоммерческая исследовательская служба «Среда», 2011.
Added: Feb 7, 2013
Edited by: А. Михайлов Вып. 14. М.: Социологический факультет МГУ, 2012.
Added: Mar 14, 2013
Аистов А. В., Леонова Л. А. ÐаÑÑнÑе Ð´Ð¾ÐºÐ»Ð°Ð´Ñ Ð»Ð°Ð±Ð¾ÑаÑоÑии колиÑеÑÑвенного анализа и моделиÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ñкономики. P1. ÐижегоÑодÑкий Ñилиал ÐÐУ ÐШÐ, 2010. â Р1/2010/04.
Added: May 21, 2012